Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264361›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017

Nebulized anticoagulants in lung injury in critically ill patients-an updated systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Jenny Juschten, Pieter R Tuinman, Nicole P Juffermans, Barry Dixon, Marcel Levi, Marcus J Schultz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04466670 (Dynamics of Hemostatic Parameters in COVID-19 and Comparison of Intervention Strategies Through Adaptive Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04466670 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Dynamics of Hemostatic Parameters in COVID-19 and Comparison of Intervention Strategies Through Adaptive Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled379ConditionsCOVID-19Armsacetylsalicylic acid, Unfractionated heparin nebulized
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Future Trends in Nebulized Therapies for Pulmonary Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jenny JuschtenLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter R TuinmanDepartment of Intensive Care and Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nicole P JuffermansLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Barry DixonDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Marcel LeviDepartment of Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Marcus J SchultzLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLMahidol University · THSt Vincent's Hospital · AUUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia, inhalation trauma and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), typical causes of lung injury in critically ill patients, are all three characterized by dysregulated inflammation and coagulation in the lungs. Nebulized anticoagulants are thought to have beneficial effects as they could attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy and maybe even affect pulmonary inflammation. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed using terms referring to aspects of the condition ('pneumonia', 'inhalation trauma' and 'ARDS'), the intervention ('nebulized', 'vaporized', and 'aerosolized') and anticoagulants limited to agents that are commercially available and frequently given or tested in critically ill patients ['heparin', 'danaparoid', 'activated protein C' (APC), 'antithrombin' (AT) and 'tissue factor pathway inhibitor' (TFPI)]. The systematic search identified 16 articles reporting on preclinical studies and 11 articles reporting on human trials. All nebulized anticoagulants attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy in preclinical studies using various models for lung injury, but the effects on inflammation are less consistent. Nebulized heparin, danaparoid and TFPI, but not APC and AT also reduced systemic coagulation. Nebulized heparin in lung injury patients shows contradictory results, and there is concern over systemic side effects of this strategy. Future studies need to focus on the way to nebulize anticoagulants, as well as on efficient but safe dosages, and other side effects.

Indexed as

anticoagulantslung injuryNebulization

Identifiers

PMID29264361
PMCPMC5721225
OpenAlexW2752352935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.