Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264208›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2017

Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Adam Howe, Zachary Kozel, Lane Palmer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349161 (Long-term Outcome of Retroperitoneoscopic One-trocar-assisted Pyeloplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06349161 completednot on this map

Long-term Outcome of Retroperitoneoscopic One-trocar-assisted Pyeloplasty: A Single-center and Single-surgeon Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Children's Hospital, VietnamRan2011 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsUreteropelvic Junction ObstructionArmsOne-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. First Pediatric Pyeloplasty Using the SenhanceChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam HoweSteven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center Ringgold Standard Institution - Pediatric Urology, Center for Advanced Medicine Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Zachary KozelLong Island Jewish Medical Center Ringgold Standard Institution - Urology, Center for Advanced Medicine Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Lane PalmerSteven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center Ringgold Standard Institution - Pediatric Urology, Pediatric Urology Associates, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Arthur Smith Institute for Urology · USSchneider Children's Hospital · USUrology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While robotic surgery has shown clear utility and advantages in the adult population, its role in pediatrics remains controversial. Pediatric-sized robotic instruments and equipment are not readily available yet, so certain modifications can be made in order to make robotic surgery successful in children. While the cost of robotic surgery remains high compared to open procedures, patients experience greater satisfaction and quality of life with robotic surgery. Robotic pyeloplasty is a standard of care in older children, and has even been performed in infants and re-do surgery. Other robotic procedures performed in children include heminephroureterectomy, ureteroureterostomy, ureteral reimplantation, urachal cyst excision, bladder diverticulectomy, and bladder reconstructive procedures such as augmentation, appendicovesicostomy, antegrade continence enema, bladder neck reconstruction and sling, as well as other procedures. Robotic surgery has also been used in oncologic cases such as partial nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Future improvements in technology with production of pediatric-sized robotic instruments, along with increases in robotic-trained pediatric urologists and surgeon experience along each's learning curve, will help to further advance the field of robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Indexed as

ChildrenPediatricRoboticRobotic-assistedUrology

Identifiers

PMID29264208
PMCPMC5730905
OpenAlexW2510232807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.