ReviewAsian journal of urology2016
Non-invasive actionable biomarkers for metastatic prostate cancer.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular determinants of AR-enhancer interaction and cistrome reprogramming in prostate cancer progression.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of neuroendocrine differentiation in castration-resistant prostate cancer and advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine prostate cancer.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Glucocorticoid receptor and androgen receptor-targeting therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Colorimetric LAMP microfluidic chip for detecting three allergens: peanut, sesame and soybean.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Androgen receptor degradation by the proteolysis-targeting chimera ARCC-4 outperforms enzalutamide in cellular models of prostate cancer drug resistance.Communications biology · 2018Article
- Biology and therapy of urological cancer metastasis.Asian journal of urology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the current clinical setting, many disease management options are available for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. For metastatic prostate cancer, first-line therapies almost always involve agents designed to inhibit androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) that arise following first-line androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) may continue to respond to additional lines of AR-targeting therapies (abiraterone and enzalutamide), chemotherapies (docetaxel and cabazitaxel), bone-targeting Radium-223 therapy, and immunotherapy sipuleucel-T. The rapidly expanding therapies for CRPC is expected to transform this lethal disease into one that can be managed for prolonged period of time. In the past 3 years, a number of promising biomarkers that may help to guide treatment decisions have been proposed and evaluated, including androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7), a truncated AR lacking the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and mediate constitutively-active AR signaling. Putative treatment selection markers such as AR-V7 may further improve survival benefit of existing therapies and help to accelerate development of new agents for metastatic prostate cancer. In the metastatic setting, it is important to consider compatibility between the putative biomarker with non-invasive sampling. In this review, biomarkers relevant to the setting of metastatic prostate cancer are discussed with respect to a number of key attributes critical for clinical development of non-invasive, actionable markers. It is envisioned that biomarkers for metastatic prostate cancer will continue to be discovered, developed, and refined to meet the unmet needs in both standard-of-care and clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.