Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264133›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2015

Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Husain Alenezi, John D Denstedt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07306819 (Flexible Ureteroscopy Using a Tip-Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07306819 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Flexible Ureteroscopy Using a Tip-Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsStone, Renal, Stone, Urinary, Stone, KidneyArmsmini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Flexible Uerteroscopy with Tip-Bendable Suction Sheath
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of a synchronous motion-tracking and video capture tool for flexible ureteroscopy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. SemirigidMaedica · 2023
    Article
  19. A robotic system for solo surgery in flexible ureteroscopy: development and evaluation with clinical users.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Husain AleneziDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
John D DenstedtDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 3 decades have witnessed great improvements in the technology and clinical applications of many minimally invasive procedures in the urological field. Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has advanced considerably to become a widely utilized diagnostic and therapeutic tool for multiple upper urinary tract pathologies. The most common indication for fURS is the treatment of upper urinary tract stones with the aid of Holmium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy. Advancements in endoscope technologies and operative techniques have lead to a broader application of fURS in the management of urolithiasis to include larger and more complex stones. fURS has proved to be an effective and safe procedure with few contraindications. Continued progression in fURS may increase its clinical applicability and supplant other procedures as the first line treatment option for urolithiasis.

Indexed as

EndoscopyFlexible ureteroscopyRenal stoneUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID29264133
PMCPMC5730717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.