Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264060›Full record

ReviewJournal of general and family medicine2017

Diabetes prevention in the real world: Insights from the JDPP and J-DOIT1.

Naoki Sakane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general and family medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naoki SakaneDivision of Preventive Medicine Clinical Research Institute National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Kyoto Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Diabetes prevention is an urgent issue in Japan. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and US Diabetes Prevention Program revealed that intensive lifestyle intervention can prevent or delay the development of T2D in high-risk populations. Translational research varies in hospitals, primary care, communities, the workplace, and other settings. Translational research is feasible but less effective. There have been no long-term follow-ups. The outcome of the studies was mainly weight changes. The Japan Diabetes Prevention Program (JDPP) is a trial to test the efficacy of a lifestyle intervention program, which carried out in a primary healthcare setting using existing resources. The Japan Diabetes Outcome Trial-1 (J-DOIT1) is a nationwide telephone-delivered lifestyle intervention in a real-world setting. This review will focus on the effectiveness of a diabetes prevention program (recruitment, target population, method of intervention, and evaluation) in the real world and insights from the JDPP and J-DOIT1.

Indexed as

diabetes preventionlifestyle interventiontranslation research

Identifiers

PMID29264060
PMCPMC5729318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.