Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263893›Full record

ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy

Osteosarcoma: prognosis plateau warrants retinoblastoma pathway targeted therapy.

Sarah E Ballatori, Philip W Hinds

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding the role of vitamin D in osteosarcoma: A narrative review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Whole-Exome Analysis and Osteosarcoma: A Game Still Open.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah E BallatoriDepartment of Developmental, Molecular and Chemical Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Philip W HindsDepartment of Developmental, Molecular and Chemical Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone cancer in children and adolescents, affecting ~560 young patients in the United States annually. The term OS describes a diverse array of subtypes with varying prognoses, but the majority of tumors are high grade and aggressive. Perhaps because the true etiology of these aggressive tumors remains unknown, advances in OS treatment have reached a discouraging plateau, with only incremental improvements over the past 40 years. Thus, research surrounding the pathogenesis of OS is essential, as it promises to unveil novel therapeutic targets that can attack tumor cells with greater specificity and lower toxicity. Among the candidate molecular targets in OS, the retinoblastoma (RB) pathway demonstrates the highest frequency of inactivation and thus represents a particularly promising avenue for molecular targeted therapy. This review examines the present thinking and practices in OS treatment and specifically highlights the relevance of the RB pathway in osteosarcomagenesis. Through further investigation into RB pathway-related novel therapeutic targets, we believe that a near-term breakthrough in improved OS prognosis is possible.

Identifiers

PMID29263893
PMCPMC5657420
OpenAlexW2335452694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.