Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263855›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2016

First vaccine approval under the FDA Animal Rule.

David W C Beasley, Trevor L Brasel, Jason E Comer

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Natural History ofVaccines · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Preclinical Animal Models for Q Fever Vaccine Development.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David W C BeasleyOffice of Regulated Nonclinical Studies, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Trevor L BraselOffice of Regulated Nonclinical Studies, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Jason E ComerOffice of Regulated Nonclinical Studies, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

Health, Safety and Training ServicesUC7AI070083 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI LEMON, STANLEY M. · 2006 to 2010
$49.5M
NIAID NIH HHS UC7 AI070083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration's Animal Rule was established to facilitate licensure of new products for life-threatening conditions when traditional efficacy trials in humans are unethical or impractical. In November, 2015 BioThrax became the first vaccine to receive approval for a new indication via this pathway. The basis for this approval and use of Animal Rule or other non-traditional approval pathways for licensure of vaccines for serious conditions are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID29263855
PMCPMC5707879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.