ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2017
Workflow optimization of whole genome amplification and targeted panel sequencing for CTC mutation detection.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epithelial‑derived head and neck squamous tumourigenesis (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Advancements in Circulating Tumor Cell Research: Bridging Biology and Clinical Applications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Biomarkers and computational models for predicting efficacy to tumor ICI immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Review
- Flow Sorting, Whole Genome Amplification and Next-Generation Sequencing as Combined Tools to Study Heterogeneous Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mapping the Potential of Microfluidics in Early Diagnosis and Personalized Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Assessment of Different Circulating Tumor Cell Platforms for Uveal Melanoma: Potential Impact for Future Routine Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Circulating tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA analyses in urothelial cancer using the LiquidBiopsy platform.Current urology · 2022Article
- Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells as Predictive Markers for Cancer Incidence and Relapse.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Preanalytical Variables and Sample Quality Control for Clinical Variant Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- TASPERT: Target-Specific Reverse Transcript Pools to Improve HTS Plant Virus Diagnostics.Viruses · 2021Article
- Review
- Inertial Microfluidics Enabling Clinical Research.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Ultra-Low DNA Input into Whole Genome Methylation Assays and Detection of Oncogenic Methylation and Copy Number Variants in Circulating Tumour DNA.Epigenomes · 2021Article
- Optimization of a WGA-Free Molecular Tagging-Based NGS Protocol for CTCs Mutational Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Cell Separations and Sorting.Analytical chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may prove useful as a surrogate for conventional tissue biopsies. This is particularly important as studies have shown different mutational profiles between CTCs and ctDNA in some tumor subtypes. However, isolating rare CTCs from whole blood has significant hurdles. Very limited DNA quantities often can't meet NGS requirements without whole genome amplification (WGA). Moreover, white blood cells (WBC) germline contamination may confound CTC somatic mutation analyses. Thus, a good CTC enrichment platform with an efficient WGA and NGS workflow are needed. Here, Vortex label-free CTC enrichment platform was used to capture CTCs. DNA extraction was optimized, WGA evaluated and targeted NGS tested. We used metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) as the clinical target, HCT116 as the corresponding cell line, GenomePlex® and REPLI-g as the WGA methods, GeneRead DNAseq Human CRC Panel as the 38 gene panel. The workflow was further validated on metastatic CRC patient samples, assaying both tumor and CTCs. WBCs from the same patients were included to eliminate germline contaminations. The described workflow performed well on samples with sufficient DNA, but showed bias for rare cells with limited DNA input. REPLI-g provided an unbiased amplification on fresh rare cells, enabling an accurate variant calling using the targeted NGS. Somatic variants were detected in patient CTCs and not found in age matched healthy donors. This demonstrates the feasibility of a simple workflow for clinically relevant monitoring of tumor genetics in real time and over the course of a patient's therapy using CTCs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.