Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263798›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2018

Classification of gene signatures for their information value and functional redundancy.

Laura Cantini, Laurence Calzone, Loredana Martignetti, Mattias Rydenfelt, Nils Blüthgen, Emmanuel Barillot, Andrei Zinovyev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PMHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiotherapy resistance: identifying universal biomarkers for various human cancers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura CantiniInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Mines ParisTech, 26, rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris, France.
Laurence CalzoneInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Mines ParisTech, 26, rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris, France.
Loredana MartignettiInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Mines ParisTech, 26, rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris, France.
Mattias RydenfeltInstitute of Pathology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Nils BlüthgenInstitute of Pathology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Emmanuel BarillotInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Mines ParisTech, 26, rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-2002
Andrei ZinovyevInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Mines ParisTech, 26, rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene signatures are more and more used to interpret results of omics data analyses but suffer from compositional (large overlap) and functional (correlated read-outs) redundancy. Moreover, many gene signatures rarely come out as significant in statistical tests. Based on pan-cancer data analysis, we construct a restricted set of 962 signatures defined as informative and demonstrate that they have a higher probability to appear enriched in comparative cancer studies. We show that the majority of informative signatures conserve their weights for the genes composing the signature (eigengenes) from one cancer type to another. We finally construct InfoSigMap, an interactive online map of these signatures and their cross-correlations. This map highlights the structure of compositional and functional redundancies between informative signatures, and it charts the territories of biological functions. InfoSigMap can be used to visualize the results of omics data analyses and suggests a rearrangement of existing gene sets.

Identifiers

PMID29263798
PMCPMC5736638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.