ArticleMethods in ecology and evolution2017
Identifying consistent allele frequency differences in studies of stratified populations.
Article in Methods in ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- European ash pangenome reveals widespread structural variation and genetic basis of low ash dieback susceptibility.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Beyond fixation: persistent genetic variation under intense selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Introgression of thermal tolerance alleles drives adaptation despite risk of mitonuclear conflict.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Experimental Evolution Under Biased Sex Ratios: Phenotypic and Genomic Responses in the Bulb Mite, Rhizoglyphus robini.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Beyond Fixation: Persistent Genetic Variation Under Intense Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Characterization of the Arabian Horse Population in Tunisia Using Microsatellites.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Variation in the resource environment affects patterns of seasonal adaptation at phenotypic and genomic levels inEvolution letters · 2025Article
- Identifying the Degree of Gene Reuse During Repeated Adaptation.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Beneficial reversal of dominance maintains a large-effect resistance polymorphism under fluctuating insecticide selection.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Pervasive fitness trade-offs revealed by rapid adaptation to shifting population densities in large experimental populations ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Limited Migration From Physiological Refugia Constrains the Rescue of Native Gastropods Facing an Invasive Predator.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Article
- MetaQuad: shared informative variants discovery in metagenomic samples.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Haplotype based testing for a better understanding of the selective architecture.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Embracing Complexity: Yeast Evolution Experiments Featuring Standing Genetic Variation.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Bait-ER: A Bayesian method to detect targets of selection in Evolve-and-Resequence experiments.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Slow Recovery from Inbreeding Depression Generated by the Complex Genetic Architecture of Segregating Deleterious Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- The molecular architecture of Drosophila melanogaster defense against Beauveria bassiana explored through evolve and resequence and quantitative trait locus mapping.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- From tides to nucleotides: Genomic signatures of adaptation to environmental heterogeneity in barnacles.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing application of pooled-sequencing approaches to population genomics robust methods are needed to accurately quantify allele frequency differences between populations. Identifying consistent differences across stratified populations can allow us to detect genomic regions under selection and that differ between populations with different histories or attributes. Current popular statistical tests are easily implemented in widely available software tools which make them simple for researchers to apply. However, there are potential problems with the way such tests are used, which means that underlying assumptions about the data are frequently violated.These problems are highlighted by simulation of simple but realistic population genetic models of neutral evolution and the performance of different tests are assessed. We present alternative tests (including Generalised Linear Models [GLMs] with quasibinomial error structure) with attractive properties for the analysis of allele frequency differences and re-analyse a published dataset.The simulations show that common statistical tests for consistent allele frequency differences perform poorly, with high false positive rates. Applying tests that do not confound heterogeneity and main effects significantly improves inference. Variation in sequencing coverage likely produces many false positives and re-scaling allele frequencies to counts out of a common value or an effective sample size reduces this effect.Many researchers are interested in identifying allele frequencies that vary consistently across replicates to identify loci underlying phenotypic responses to selection or natural variation in phenotypes. Popular methods that have been suggested for this task perform poorly in simulations. Overall, quasibinomial GLMs perform better and also have the attractive feature of allowing correction for multiple testing by standard procedures and are easily extended to other designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.