Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263735›Full record

ReviewClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases

Oral calcidiol is a good form of vitamin D supplementation.

Piergianni Biondi, Jessica Pepe, Federica Biamonte, Marco Occhiuto, Martina Parisi, Chiara Demofonti, Valeria Baffa, Salvatore Minisola, Cristiana Cipriani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piergianni BiondiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jessica PepeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Federica BiamonteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco OcchiutoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Martina ParisiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Chiara DemofontiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Valeria BaffaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore MinisolaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cristiana CiprianiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D supplementation represents an important topic in the field of metabolic bone disease. Calcidiol, the 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D], is the form of vitamin D most recently introduced in clinical practice. Advantages of the use of calcidiol derive from the pharmacokinetic properties and are related to the possibility of use in patients with liver disease, obese patients, patients with intestinal malabsorption, secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with chronic kidney disease as well as to avoid any possible toxic effect when high doses are used. The ADDI-D study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of calcidiol at the daily dose of 20 or 40 μg and 125 μg/week. In particular, the daily dose of 40 μg can be suggested as an alternative in severely deficient patients, as it has demonstrated to ensure higher vitamin D levels, compared to the 20 μg/day and the weekly 125 μg dose. The last can be an option when issues with compliance to the supplementation are present.

Indexed as

calcidiolhypovitaminosis Dsupplementationvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID29263735
PMCPMC5726211
OpenAlexW2773242932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.