ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017
Long-term outcomes in half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous retinopathy.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy: new options for an old disease.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Photodynamic treatment without verteporfin in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Real world outcomes of photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- The Role of Imaging in Planning Treatment for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Photodynamic Therapy with Verteporfin for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Review of Data and Efficacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Elderly Patients Mimicking Occult Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Long-Term Effects of Half-Time Photodynamic Therapy on Retinal Sensitivity in Eyes with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.BioMed research international · 2020Observational
- Chorioretinal response to intravitreal aflibercept injection in acute central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Management of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Review
- Article
- Crossover to PDT after the unsuccessful micropulse laser treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of half-dose verteporfin with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of chronic central serous retinopathy (CSR).
designRetrospective case series.
participants45 eyes in 39 patients with chronic CSR were included. Diagnosis of chronic CSR was confirmed by fluorescein angiography and persistence of subretinal fluid by optical coherence tomography for a minimum of 3 months duration.
methodsEach patient underwent treatment with half-dose verteporfin with full-fluence PDT; initial follow-up was defined as a 6-8 week visit following the treatment, and final follow-up ranged from 5 to 70 months.
resultsThe average follow-up period for treatment was 19.3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity increased from logMAR means of 0.52 to 0.42 (
conclusionHalf-dose PDT is an effective treatment option for chronic CSR in a Canadian population, and it is both safe and durable. The positive treatment effect is realized rapidly, with the initial 6-week result highly correlated with the final follow-up result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.