Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The importance of filamentous cyanobacteria in the development of oxygenic photogranules.

Kim Milferstedt, W Camilla Kuo-Dahab, Caitlyn S Butler, Jérôme Hamelin, Ahmed S Abouhend, Kristie Stauch-White, Adam McNair, Christopher Watt, Blanca I Carbajal-González, Sona Dolan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the interactions between algae and archaea.Marine life science & technology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Microalgal-bacterial aggregates for wastewater treatment: Origins, challenges, and future directions.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Review
  8. Mechanisms of microbial co-aggregation in mixed anaerobic cultures.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kim MilferstedtLBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, 102 Avenue des étangs, 11100, Narbonne, France. kim.milferstedt@inra.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1186-3982
W Camilla Kuo-DahabDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Caitlyn S ButlerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Jérôme HamelinLBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, 102 Avenue des étangs, 11100, Narbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-6349
Ahmed S AbouhendDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Kristie Stauch-WhiteDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Adam McNairDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Christopher WattDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Blanca I Carbajal-GonzálezScience Center Microscopy Facility, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, 01075, USA.
Sona DolanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Chul ParkLBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, 102 Avenue des étangs, 11100, Narbonne, France. chulp@umass.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms often respond to their environment by growing as densely packed communities in biofilms, flocs or granules. One major advantage of life in these aggregates is the retention of its community in an ecosystem despite flowing water. We describe here a novel type of granule dominated by filamentous and motile cyanobacteria of the order Oscillatoriales. These bacteria form a mat-like photoactive outer layer around an otherwise unconsolidated core. The spatial organization of the phototrophic layer resembles microbial mats growing on sediments but is spherical. We describe the production of these oxygenic photogranules under static batch conditions, as well as in turbulently mixed bioreactors. Photogranulation defies typically postulated requirements for granulation in biotechnology, i.e., the need for hydrodynamic shear and selective washout. Photogranulation as described here is a robust phenomenon with respect to inoculum characteristics and environmental parameters like carbon sources. A bioprocess using oxygenic photogranules is an attractive candidate for energy-positive wastewater treatment as it biologically couples CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideCytoplasmic GranulesGeologic SedimentsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOscillatoriaOxygenCarbon DioxideOxygen

Identifiers

PMID29263358
PMCPMC5738420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.