Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263283›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Infections on the move: how transient phases of host movement influence disease spread.

D R Daversa, A Fenton, A I Dell, T W J Garner, A Manica

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Parasite prevalence is determined by infection state- and risk-dependent dispersal of the host.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A unifying framework for the transient parasite dynamics of migratory hosts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D R DaversaInstitute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK ddaversa@liv.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-8897
A FentonInstitute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
A I DellNational Great Rivers Research and Education Centre (NGRREC), East Alton, IL 62024, USA.
T W J GarnerInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-9706
A ManicaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1895-450X
Zoological Society of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal movement impacts the spread of human and wildlife diseases, and there is significant interest in understanding the role of migrations, biological invasions and other wildlife movements in spatial infection dynamics. However, the influence of processes acting on infections during transient phases of host movement is poorly understood. We propose a conceptual framework that explicitly considers infection dynamics during transient phases of host movement to better predict infection spread through spatial host networks. Accounting for host transient movement captures key processes that occur while hosts move between locations, which together determine the rate at which hosts spread infections through networks. We review theoretical and empirical studies of host movement and infection spread, highlighting the multiple factors that impact the infection status of hosts. We then outline characteristics of hosts, parasites and the environment that influence these dynamics. Recent technological advances provide disease ecologists unprecedented ability to track the fine-scale movement of organisms. These, in conjunction with experimental testing of the factors driving infection dynamics during host movement, can inform models of infection spread based on constituent biological processes.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildModels, Biologicalepidemiologyhost–parasite interactionsmetapopulationsmovementnetworksspatial modelling

Identifiers

PMID29263283
PMCPMC5745403
OpenAlexW2778087296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.