ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual speech enhances phoneme separability in human superior temporal gyrus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neural correlates of phonetic categorization under auditory (phoneme) and visual (grapheme) modalities.Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Repeatedly experiencing the McGurk effect induces long-lasting changes in auditory speech perception.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Cross-Modal Tinnitus Remediation: A Tentative Theoretical Framework.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The McGurk Illusion: A Default Mechanism of the Auditory System.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography sensory potentials.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Article
- Functional localization of audiovisual speech using near infrared spectroscopy.Brain topography · 2022Article
- A structured ICA-based process for removing auditory evoked potentials.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Rethinking the Mechanisms Underlying the McGurk Illusion.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- The Cross-Modal Suppressive Role of Visual Context on Speech Intelligibility: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual Speech Processing and the Role of Orofacial Effectors for Cross-Modal Predictions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Neural evidence accounting for interindividual variability of the McGurk illusion.Neuroscience letters · 2019Article
- Article
- A Laboratory Study of the McGurk Effect in 324 Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Audiovisual (AV) integration is essential for speech comprehension, especially in adverse listening situations. Divergent, but not mutually exclusive, theories have been proposed to explain the neural mechanisms underlying AV integration. One theory advocates that this process occurs via interactions between the auditory and visual cortices, as opposed to fusion of AV percepts in a multisensory integrator. Building upon this idea, we proposed that AV integration in spoken language reflects visually induced weighting of phonetic representations at the auditory cortex. EEG was recorded while male and female human subjects watched and listened to videos of a speaker uttering consonant vowel (CV) syllables /ba/ and /fa/, presented in Auditory-only, AV congruent or incongruent contexts. Subjects reported whether they heard /ba/ or /fa/. We hypothesized that vision alters phonetic encoding by dynamically weighting which phonetic representation in the auditory cortex is strengthened or weakened. That is, when subjects are presented with visual /fa/ and acoustic /ba/ and hear /fa/ (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.