Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263239›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Decoding Trans-Saccadic Memory.

Grace Edwards, Rufin VanRullen, Patrick Cavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Post-saccadic disruption of semantic category information in naturalistic scenes.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fast Feature- and Category-Related Parafoveal Previewing Support Free Visual Exploration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Presaccadic preview shapes postsaccadic processing more where perception is poor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Decoding Remapped Spatial Information in the Peri-Saccadic Period.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Perceptual learning across saccades: Feature but not location specific.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Visual Remapping.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace EdwardsCenter for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Technologia, Corso Bettini 31 38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy, grace.edwards@iit.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-9339
Rufin VanRullenCentre de Recherche et Cognition (CerCo), CNRS et Université Paul Sabatier, Pavillon Baudot Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, 31052 Toulouse Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-7716
Patrick CavanaghLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, 75006 Paris, France, and.ORCID 0000-0003-3164-2340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine whether peripheral information at a planned saccade target affects immediate postsaccadic processing at the fovea on saccade landing. Current neuroimaging research suggests that presaccadic stimulation has a late effect on postsaccadic processing, in contrast to the early effect seen in behavioral studies. Human participants (both male and female) were instructed to saccade toward a face or a house that, on different trials, remained the same, changed, or disappeared during the saccade. We used a multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalography data to decode face versus house processing directly after the saccade. The classifier was trained on separate trials without a saccade, where a house or face was presented at the fovea. When the saccade target remained the same across the saccade, we could reliably decode the target 123 ms after saccade offset. In contrast, when the target was changed during the saccade, the new target was decoded at a later time-point, 151 ms after saccade offset. The "same" condition advantage suggests that congruent presaccadic information facilitates processing of the postsaccadic stimulus compared with incongruent information. Finally, the saccade target could be decoded above chance even when it had been removed during the saccade, albeit with a slower time course (162 ms) and poorer signal strength. These findings indicate that information about the (peripheral) presaccadic stimulus is transferred across the saccade so that it becomes quickly available and influences processing at its expected new retinal position (the fovea).

Indexed as

AdultElectroencephalographyFaceFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleMemoryNeuroimagingPhotic StimulationRetinaSaccadesVisual PerceptionYoung Adultelectroencephalographymultivariate pattern analysistrans-saccadic information

Identifiers

PMID29263239
PMCPMC6596263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.