Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29263029›Full record

ArticleGenetics2018

Fine-Scale Recombination Maps of Fungal Plant Pathogens Reveal Dynamic Recombination Landscapes and Intragenic Hotspots.

Eva H Stukenbrock, Julien Y Dutheil

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative mitogenomic analysis ofFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  10. The genome of a globally invasive passerine, the common myna, Acridotheres tristis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Domestication Shapes Recombination Patterns in Tomato.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva H StukenbrockEnvironmental Genomics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany stukenbrock@evolbio.mpg.de dutheil@evolbio.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8590-3345
Julien Y DutheilEvolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany stukenbrock@evolbio.mpg.de dutheil@evolbio.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-4121
Kiel University · DEUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is an important driver of evolution. Variability in the intensity of recombination across chromosomes can affect sequence composition, nucleotide variation, and rates of adaptation. In many organisms, recombination events are concentrated within short segments termed recombination hotspots. The variation in recombination rate and positions of recombination hotspot can be studied using population genomics data and statistical methods. In this study, we conducted population genomics analyses to address the evolution of recombination in two closely related fungal plant pathogens: the prominent wheat pathogen

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularRecombination, GeneticAscomycotaBase CompositionCentromereChromosomes, FungalCrossing Over, GeneticGenome, FungalGenomicsLinkage DisequilibriumPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single Nucleotideeffectorsfungal plant pathogensgenome evolutionrecombination analysesrecombination hotspotsZymoseptoria

Identifiers

PMID29263029
PMCPMC5844332
OpenAlexW2777140368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.