Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29262700›Full record

Observational studyCartilage2018

Early Clinically Relevant Improvement in Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes 1 Year Postsurgery in Patients with Knee and Hip Joint Arthroplasties.

Audrey Neuprez, Arnaud H Neuprez, Jean-François Kaux, William Kurth, Christophe Daniel, Thierry Thirion, Jean-Pierre Huskin, Philippe Gillet, Olivier Bruyère, Jean-Yves Reginster

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cartilage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty exhibits small kinematic changes in the first postoperative year.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Audrey Neuprez1 Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Arnaud H Neuprez1 Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Jean-François Kaux2 Rehabilitation and Sports Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
William Kurth3 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Christophe Daniel3 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Thierry Thirion3 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre Huskin3 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Philippe Gillet3 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Olivier Bruyère1 Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Jean-Yves Reginster1 Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To measure and identify the determinants of the outcomes after hip/knee arthroplasty (HA/KA) in patients with osteoarthritis during the first postsurgical year. Design In this prospective observational study, we evaluated the preoperative and postoperative (3, 6, and 12 months) outcomes of 626 patients who underwent HA (346 with median age 65 years, 59% female) or KA (280 with median age 66.5 years, 54% female) between 2008 and 2013. Generic and specific tools were used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and utility. Good outcome was defined as an improvement in WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) greater than or equal to the minimal important difference (MID). Regressions were performed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative measures and evolution of WOMAC/good outcome. Results We observed an almost systematic improvement of all parameters for up to 12 months, but especially at the 3-month follow-up. The low number of comorbidities and the absence of postoperative complications were the common determinants of improvement of WOMAC total score after 12 months. Other parameters (background of the joint, preoperative function and length of hospital stay in KA group; place of discharge in HA group) affected the evolution of WOMAC scores. 87.09% of HA and 73.06% of KA patients experienced a good outcome. A small number of comorbidities, a worse preoperative function, a shortened hospital stay (KA only), and an absence of early postoperative complications (HA only) significantly predicted a good outcome. Conclusions Intermediate HRQoL following HA or KA improved quickly from preoperative levels for all instruments. More than 70% of patients achieved a good outcome defined as improved pain, stiffness and disability and the predictors are slightly close.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHumansKnee JointLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareProspective Studiesarthroplastyhipkneeosteoarthritisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID29262700
PMCPMC5871126
OpenAlexW2776739169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.