Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29262573›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Differential expression of c-Met between primary and metastatic sites in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma and its association with PD-L1 expression.

Aly-Khan A Lalani, Kathryn P Gray, Laurence Albiges, Marcella Callea, Jean-Christophe Pignon, Soumitro Pal, Mamta Gupta, Rupal S Bhatt, David F McDermott, Michael B Atkins and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. MET alterations in biphasic squamoid alveolar papillary renal cell carcinomas and clinicopathological features.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Identification ofCancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aly-Khan A LalaniLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn P GrayDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Laurence AlbigesInstitut Goustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Marcella CalleaDepartment of Pathology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Jean-Christophe PignonDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Soumitro PalDivision of Nephrology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mamta GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Rupal S BhattDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
David F McDermottDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael B AtkinsGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington D.C., USA.
G F Vande WoudeVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MA, USA.
Lauren C HarshmanLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Toni K ChoueiriLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sabina SignorettiDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preclinical models, c-Met promotes survival of renal cancer cells through the regulation of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, this relationship in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not well characterized. We evaluated c-Met expression in ccRCC patients using paired primary and metastatic samples and assessed the association with PD-L1 expression and other clinical features. Areas with predominant and highest Fuhrman nuclear grade (FNG) were selected. c-Met expression was evaluated by IHC using an anti-Met monoclonal antibody (MET4 Ab) and calculated by a combined score (CS, 0-300): intensity of c-Met staining (0-3) x % of positive cells (0-100). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was previously assessed by IHC and PD-L1+ was defined as PD-L1 > 0% positive cells. Our cohort consisted of 45 pairs of primary and metastatic ccRCC samples. Overall, c-Met expression was higher in metastatic sites compared to primary sites (average c-Met CS: 55 vs. 28,

Indexed as

c-MetmetastasisPD-L1primaryrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29262573
PMCPMC5732739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.