Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29262564›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Plasmatic miR-210, miR-221 and miR-1233 profile: potential liquid biopsies candidates for renal cell carcinoma.

Francisca Dias, Ana Luísa Teixeira, Marta Ferreira, Bárbara Adem, Nuno Bastos, Joana Vieira, Mara Fernandes, Maria Inês Sequeira, Joaquina Maurício, Francisco Lobo and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Epigenetic Biomarkers of Renal Cell Carcinoma for Liquid Biopsy Tests.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisca DiasMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Ana Luísa TeixeiraMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Marta FerreiraMedical Oncology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Bárbara AdemMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Nuno BastosMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Joana VieiraGenetics Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Mara FernandesMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Maria Inês SequeiraMedical Oncology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Joaquina MaurícioMedical Oncology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Francisco LoboUrology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
António MoraisUrology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Jorge OliveiraUrology Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Klaas KokDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rui MedeirosMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTIPO Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTFernando Pessoa University · PTPortuguese League Against Epilepsy · PTUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a challenge for clinicians since the nonexistence of screening and monitoring tests contributes to the fact that one-third of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease and 20-40% of the remaining patients will also develop metastasis. Modern medicine is now trying to establish circulating biomolecules as the gold standard of biomarkers. Among the molecules that can be released from tumor cells we can find microRNAs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of cancer-related miR-210, miR-218, miR-221 and miR-1233 as prognostic biomarkers for RCC. Patients with higher levels of miR-210, miR-221 and miR-1233 presented a higher risk of specific death by RCC and a lower cancer-specific survival. The addition of miR-210, miR-221 and miR-1233 plasma levels information improved the capacity to predict death by cancer in 8, 4% when compared to the current variables used by clinicians. We also verified that hypoxia stimulates the release of miR-210 and miR-1233 from HKC-8, RCC-FG2 and 786-O cell lines. These results support the addition of circulating microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for RCC.

Indexed as

circulating miRNAsprognostic biomarkersrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29262564
PMCPMC5732730
OpenAlexW2764337968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.