Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29262550›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Predictive clinical parameters for the response of nivolumab in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Yuko Oya, Tatsuya Yoshida, Hiroaki Kuroda, Masashi Mikubo, Chiaki Kondo, Junichi Shimizu, Yoshitsugu Horio, Yukinori Sakao, Toyoaki Hida, Yasushi Yatabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuko OyaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Tatsuya YoshidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki KurodaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Masashi MikuboDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Chiaki KondoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Junichi ShimizuDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshitsugu HorioDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yukinori SakaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toyoaki HidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab offers a superior survival benefit over docetaxel in patients with advanced, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An association between programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the efficacy of nivolumab has been reported in many studies. However, the association between the clinical parameters and efficacy of nivolumab remains unclear in advanced NSCLC patients.

resultsAmong 124 patients, 108 (88%) were performance status (PS) 0 to 1. PD-L1 expression was assessed in 89 patients, with 51 (57%) patients having PD-L1 positive expression. In all patients, the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with elevated CRP levels (≥ 1 mg/dl) was significantly worse than those without elevated CRP levels (< 1 mg/dl) (8.3 vs 23.4%, MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who received nivolumab as a subsequent treatment. The patient characteristics, laboratory data at baseline (C-reactive protein [CRP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), PD-L1 expression, nivolumab response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

conclusionsClinical parameters, such as PS, serum CRP, serum LDH, and smoking status, were significantly associated with the response duration and survival in patients treated with nivolumab.

Indexed as

nivolumabnon-small cell lung cancerprogrammed cell death-1(PD-1)programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)

Identifiers

PMID29262550
PMCPMC5732716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.