Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29262548›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

A framework for exploring associations between biomedical terms in PubMed.

Haixiu Yang, Lingling Zhao, Ying Zhang, Hong Ju, Dong Wang, Yang Hu, Jun Zhang, Liang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. BGMDB: A curated database linking gut microbiota dysbiosis to brain disorders.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haixiu YangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Lingling ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation and Pharmacy, Heilongjiang Province Land Reclamation Headquarters General Hospital, Harbin 150088, PR China.
Hong JuDepartment of Information Engineering, Heilongjiang Biological Science and Technology Career Academy, Harbin 150001, PR China.
Dong WangDepartment of Academic Research, Heilongjiang University of Science & Technology, Harbin 150022, PR China.
Yang HuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation and Pharmacy, Heilongjiang Province Land Reclamation Headquarters General Hospital, Harbin 150088, PR China.
Liang ChengCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-occurrence relationships in PubMed between terms accelerate the recognition of term associations. The lack of manually curated relationships in vocabularies and the rapid increase of biomedical literatures highlight the importance of co-occurrence relationships. Here we proposed a framework to explore term associations based on a standard procedure that comprises multiple tools of text mining and relationship degree calculation methods. The text of PubMed were segmented into sentences by Apache OpenNLP first, and then terms of sentences were recognized by MGREP. After that two terms occurring in a common sentence were identified as a co-occurrence relationship. The relationship degree is then calculated using Normalized MEDLINE Distance (NMD) or relationship-scaled score (RSS) method. The framework was utilized in exploring associations between terms of Gene Ontology (GO) and Disease Ontology (DO) based on co-occurrence relationship. Results show that pairs of terms with more co-occurrence relationships indicate shared more semantic relationships of ontology and genes. The identified association terms based on co-occurrence relationships were applied in constructing a disease association network (DAN). The small giant component confirms with the observation that diseases in the same class have more linkage than diseases in different classes.

Indexed as

co-occurrence relationshipframeworkterm associationtext mining

Identifiers

PMID29262548
PMCPMC5732714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.