ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Myoglobin and α-Lactalbumin Form Smaller Complexes with the Biosurfactant Rhamnolipid Than with SDS.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Sugar Headgroup on the Self-Assembly of Bioinspired Anionic Glycolipids.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Effect of the Chemical Structure of Ionic Glycolipids on Their Lyotropic Aqueous Phase Behavior.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Effects of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on the Enzyme Catalysis and Conformation of a Recombinant γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus licheniformis.The protein journal · 2023Article
- Induction, inhibition, and incorporation: Different roles for anionic and zwitterionic lysolipids in the fibrillation of the functional amyloid FapC.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- SDS-induced multi-stage unfolding of a small globular protein through different denatured states revealed by single-molecule fluorescence.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Protein unfolding by SDS: the microscopic mechanisms and the properties of the SDS-protein assembly.Nanoscale · 2020Article
- Multi-Step Unfolding and Rearrangement of α-Lactalbumin by SDS Revealed by Stopped-Flow SAXS.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- A complete picture of protein unfolding and refolding in surfactants.Chemical science · 2019Article
- Can a Charged Surfactant Unfold an Uncharged Protein?Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Size-exclusion chromatography small-angle X-ray scattering of water soluble proteins on a laboratory instrument.Journal of applied crystallography · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosurfactants (BSs) attract increasing attention as sustainable alternatives to petroleum-derived surfactants. This necessitates structural insight into how BSs interact with proteins encountered by current chemical surfactants. Thus, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) has been used for studying the structures of complexes made of the proteins α-Lactalbumin (αLA) and myoglobin (Mb) with the biosurfactant rhamnolipid (RL). For comparison, complexes between αLA and the chemical surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were also investigated. The SAXS data for pure RL micelles can be described by prolate core-shell structures with a core radius of 7.7 Å and a shell thickness of 12 Å, giving an aggregation number of 11. The small core radius is attributed to RL's complex hydrophobic tail. Data for the αLA-RL complex agree with a 12-molecule micelle with a single protein molecule in the shell. For Mb-RL, the analysis gives complexes of two connected micelles, each containing 10 RL and one protein in the shells. αLA-RL and Mb-RL form surfactant-saturated complexes above 5.6 and 4.7 mM RL, respectively, leaving the remaining RL in free micelles. The SAXS data for SDS agree with oblate-shaped micelles with a core of 20 Å, core eccentricity 0.7, and shell thickness of 5.45 Å, with an aggregation number of 74. The αLA-SDS complexes contain a prolate micelle with a core radius of 11-14 Å and a shell of 8-12 Å with up to 3 αLA per particle and up to 43 SDS per αLA, both considerably larger than for RL. Unlike the RL-protein complexes, the number of surfactant molecules in αLA-SDS complexes increases with surfactant concentration, and saturate at higher surfactant concentrations than αLA-RL complexes. The results highlight how RL and SDS follow similar overall rules of self-assembly and interactions with proteins, but that differences in the strength of protein-surfactant interactions affect the formed structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.