Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29261838›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2018

Association of an Enhanced Recovery Pilot With Length of Stay in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Julia R Berian, Kristen A Ban, Jason B Liu, Christine L Sullivan, Clifford Y Ko, Julie K M Thacker, Liane S Feldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. National Databases for Assessment of Quality.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced recovery for obese patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Observational
  8. Combining Surgical Outcomes and Patient Experiences to Evaluate Hospital Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Quality.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiome Medicine: This Changes Everything.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia R BerianDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Kristen A BanDivision of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Jason B LiuDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Christine L SullivanDivision of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Clifford Y KoDivision of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Julie K M ThackerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Liane S FeldmanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are standardized care plans of best practices that can decrease morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, many hospitals need help with implementation. The Enhanced Recovery in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ERIN) pilot was designed to support ERP implementation. Objective: To evaluate the association of the ERIN pilot with LOS after colectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using a difference-in-differences design, pilot LOS before and after ERP implementation was compared with matched controls in a hierarchical model, adjusting for case mix and random effects of hospitals and matched pairs. The setting was 15 hospitals of varied size and academic status from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Preimplementation and postimplementation colectomy cases (July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015) were collected using novel ERIN variables. Emergency and septic cases were excluded. A propensity score match identified a 2:1 control cohort of patients undergoing colectomy at non-ERIN hospitals. Interventions: Pilot hospitals developed and implemented ERPs that included expert guidance, multidisciplinary teams, data audits, and opportunities for collaboration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was LOS, and the secondary outcome was serious morbidity or mortality composite. Results: There were 4975 colectomies performed by 15 ERIN pilot hospitals (3437 before implementation and 1538 after implementation) compared with a control cohort of 9950 colectomies (4726 before implementation and 5224 after implementation). The mean LOS decreased by 1.7 days in the pilot (6.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-8] days before implementation vs 5.2 [IQR, 3-6] days after implementation, P < .001) compared with 0.4 day in controls (6.4 [IQR, 4-7] days before implementation vs 6.0 [IQR, 3-7] days after implementation, P < .001). Readmission did not differ pre-post for the pilot or controls. Serious morbidity or mortality decreased for pilot participants (485 [14.1%] before implementation vs 162 [10.5%] after implementation, P < .001), with no difference in controls, and remained significant after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96). After adjusting for differences in case mix and for clustering in hospitals and matched pairs, the adjusted difference-in-differences model demonstrated a decrease in LOS by 1.1 days in the pilot over controls (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Participating ERIN pilot hospitals achieved shorter LOS and decreased complications after elective colectomy, without increasing readmissions. The ability to implement ERPs across hospitals of varied size and resources is essential. Lessons from the ERIN pilot may inform efforts to scale this effective and evidence-based intervention.

Indexed as

AgedColectomyControlled Before-After StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPerioperative CarePilot ProjectsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29261838
PMCPMC5933392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.