Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29261768›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The longest diameter of tumor as a parameter of endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer: In comparison with tumor area.

Yoo Jin Um, Hae Won Kim, Da Hyun Jung, Jie-Hyun Kim, Jae Jun Park, Young Hoon Youn, Hyojin Park, Jong Won Kim, Seung Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoo Jin UmDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hae Won KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Da Hyun JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jie-Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-3326
Jae Jun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Hoon YounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyojin ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Won KimGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Ho ChoiGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTumor burden is important to predict clinical behaviors of cancer such as lymph node metastasis (LNM). Tumor size has been used as a parameter of tumor burden such as indication of endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer (EGC) to predict LNM. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether tumor area can be more helpful to predict clinical behaviors than longest diameter of tumor in EGC. PATIENTS AND

methods3,059 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor area was calculated by multiplying long and short diameter of the tumor in surgical specimen. Longest diameter means maximal longitudinal diameter of tumor in specimen. Clinicopathologic features were compared between longest diameter and area using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

resultsLongest diameter and area of tumor showed a strong correlation (correlation coefficient 0.859, p<0.01). The cutoff value for prediction of LNM was 20 mm of longest diameter of tumor and 270 mm2 of tumor area. There was no significant difference between longest diameter and area for prediction of LNM (AUC 0.850 vs. 0.848, respectively). In differentiated-type EGC and undifferentiated-type EGC, there was no significant difference between longest diameter and area for prediction of LNM. Among mucosal or submucosal cancer prediction value of LNM between longest diameter and area was not significantly different.

conclusionTumor area may not be more helpful to predict LNM than longest diameter in EGC. Therefore, the longest diameter of tumor may be sufficient as an indicator of tumor burden in EGC.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29261768
PMCPMC5738054
OpenAlexW2779001996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.