Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29261751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

eGARD: Extracting associations between genomic anomalies and drug responses from text.

A S M Ashique Mahmood, Shruti Rao, Peter McGarvey, Cathy Wu, Subha Madhavan, K Vijay-Shanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. emiRIT: a text-mining-based resource for microRNA information.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. iTextMine: integrated text-mining system for large-scale knowledge extraction from the literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A S M Ashique MahmoodDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8196-9264
Shruti RaoInnovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America.
Peter McGarveyInnovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America.
Cathy WuDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Subha MadhavanInnovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America.
K Vijay-ShankerDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.

Funding

MACE2K - Molecular And Clinical Extraction: A Natural Language Processing Tool for Personalized MedicineU01HG008390 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor molecular profiling plays an integral role in identifying genomic anomalies which may help in personalizing cancer treatments, improving patient outcomes and minimizing risks associated with different therapies. However, critical information regarding the evidence of clinical utility of such anomalies is largely buried in biomedical literature. It is becoming prohibitive for biocurators, clinical researchers and oncologists to keep up with the rapidly growing volume and breadth of information, especially those that describe therapeutic implications of biomarkers and therefore relevant for treatment selection. In an effort to improve and speed up the process of manually reviewing and extracting relevant information from literature, we have developed a natural language processing (NLP)-based text mining (TM) system called eGARD (extracting Genomic Anomalies association with Response to Drugs). This system relies on the syntactic nature of sentences coupled with various textual features to extract relations between genomic anomalies and drug response from MEDLINE abstracts. Our system achieved high precision, recall and F-measure of up to 0.95, 0.86 and 0.90, respectively, on annotated evaluation datasets created in-house and obtained externally from PharmGKB. Additionally, the system extracted information that helps determine the confidence level of extraction to support prioritization of curation. Such a system will enable clinical researchers to explore the use of published markers to stratify patients upfront for 'best-fit' therapies and readily generate hypotheses for new clinical trials.

Indexed as

GenomicsNatural Language ProcessingData MiningHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29261751
PMCPMC5738129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.