Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29261408›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2018

Big Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy.

Stephen J Mooney, Vikas Pejaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning algorithms for sepsis prediction: An updated meta-analysis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen J MooneyHarborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98122, USA; email: sjm2186@uw.edu.
Vikas PejaverDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education and the eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA; email: vpejaver@uw.edu.

Funding

Pediatric Injury Research Training ProgramT32HD057822 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CAROLYN A MC CARTY, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar · 2010 to 2026
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital world is generating data at a staggering and still increasing rate. While these "big data" have unlocked novel opportunities to understand public health, they hold still greater potential for research and practice. This review explores several key issues that have arisen around big data. First, we propose a taxonomy of sources of big data to clarify terminology and identify threads common across some subtypes of big data. Next, we consider common public health research and practice uses for big data, including surveillance, hypothesis-generating research, and causal inference, while exploring the role that machine learning may play in each use. We then consider the ethical implications of the big data revolution with particular emphasis on maintaining appropriate care for privacy in a world in which technology is rapidly changing social norms regarding the need for (and even the meaning of) privacy. Finally, we make suggestions regarding structuring teams and training to succeed in working with big data in research and practice.

Indexed as

Big DataMachine LearningPublic HealthCausalityConfidentialityHumansPopulation SurveillanceResearchTerminology as Topicbig datamachine learningprivacypublic healthtraining

Identifiers

PMID29261408
PMCPMC6394411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.