Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29261148›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2017

Advances in Brain Tumor Surgery for Glioblastoma in Adults.

Montserrat Lara-Velazquez, Rawan Al-Kharboosh, Stephanie Jeanneret, Carla Vazquez-Ramos, Deependra Mahato, Daryoush Tavanaiepour, Gazanfar Rahmathulla, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Montserrat Lara-VelazquezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. lara-velazquez.montserrat@mayo.edu.
Rawan Al-KharbooshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Alkharboosh.Rawan@mayo.edu.
Stephanie JeanneretDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. stjeanner@utexas.edu.
Carla Vazquez-RamosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Ramos.Carla@mayo.edu.
Deependra MahatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Mahato.Deependra@mayo.edu.
Daryoush TavanaiepourDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, 653 8th St W., Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA. Daryoush.Tavanaiepour@jax.ufl.edu.
Gazanfar RahmathullaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, 653 8th St W., Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA. Gazanfar.Rahmathulla@jax.ufl.edu.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Quinones-Hinojosa.Alfredo@mayo.edu.
Jacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary intracranial neoplasia, and is characterized by its extremely poor prognosis. Despite maximum surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, the histological heterogeneity of GBM makes total eradication impossible, due to residual cancer cells invading the parenchyma, which is not otherwise seen in radiographic images. Even with gross total resection, the heterogeneity and the dormant nature of brain tumor initiating cells allow for therapeutic evasion, contributing to its recurrence and malignant progression, and severely impacting survival. Visual delimitation of the tumor's margins with common surgical techniques is a challenge faced by many surgeons. In an attempt to achieve optimal safe resection, advances in approaches allowing intraoperative analysis of cancer and non-cancer tissue have been developed and applied in humans resulting in improved outcomes. In addition, functional paradigms based on stimulation techniques to map the brain's electrical activity have optimized glioma resection in eloquent areas such as the Broca's, Wernike's and perirolandic areas. In this review, we will elaborate on the current standard therapy for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma with a focus on surgical approaches. We will describe current technologies used for glioma resection, such as awake craniotomy, fluorescence guided surgery, laser interstitial thermal therapy and intraoperative mass spectrometry. Additionally, we will describe a newly developed tool that has shown promising results in preclinical experiments for brain cancer: optical coherence tomography.

Indexed as

awake craniotomybrain tumor surgerylaser therapynovel treatments for gliomaoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID29261148
PMCPMC5742769
OpenAlexW2777214868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.