ReviewBiosensors2017
Fluorescence-Free Biosensor Methods in Detection of Food Pathogens with a Special Focus on Listeria monocytogenes.
Review in Biosensors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Electrochemical Biosensors as a Novel Platform in the Identification of Listeriosis Infection.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Thin-Film-Based Multifunctional System for Optical Detection and Thermal Treatment of Biological Samples.Biosensors · 2022Article
- The interaction of MD-2 with small molecules in huanglian jiedu decoction play a critical role in the treatment of sepsis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Methodological Approaches for Monitoring Five Major Food Safety Hazards Affecting Food Production in the Galicia-Northern Portugal Euroregion.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Pathogens electrogenicity as a tool for in-situ metabolic activity monitoring and drug assessment in biofilms.iScience · 2021Review
- Immunomagnetic separation and Listeriamonocytogenes detection with surface-enhanced Raman scatteringTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Lab-Made Electronic Nose for Fast Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2020Article
- Early detection of bacteria using SPR imaging and event counting: experiments withRSC advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food pathogens contaminate food products that allow their growth on the shelf and also under refrigerated conditions. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to lower the limit of detection (LOD) of the method used and to obtain the results within hours to few days. Biosensor methods exploit the available technologies to individuate and provide an approximate quantification of the bacteria present in a sample. The main bottleneck of these methods depends on the aspecific binding to the surfaces and on a change in sensitivity when bacteria are in a complex food matrix with respect to bacteria in a liquid food sample. In this review, we introduce surface plasmon resonance (SPR), new advancements in SPR techniques, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), as fluorescence-free biosensing technologies for detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.