ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018
Effect of environmental factors on enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic regeneration of molecular imprinted TiO
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current advances on the photocatalytic degradation of fluoroquinolones: photoreaction mechanism and environmental application.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022Review
- Removal of vanadium and palladium ions by adsorption onto magnetic chitosan nanoparticles.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular imprinting technique combined with photocatalysis was used in the removal of fluoroquinolones. In this study, we prepared molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) and investigated the adsorption and photocatalytic regeneration performance, followed by the effect of different environmental factors and photoproduct identification. Compared with non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) and P25, MIPs had a better adsorption performance towards norfloxacin with the removal efficiency of 77.1% in 1 h. pH, humic acid, and high valence ions had significant effects on the adsorption performance. Under neutral condition, the adsorption effect of MIPs was better than that of acidic and alkaline condition. The removal efficiency declined to 25.9% when pH reached 11. The removal efficiency gradually improved with the concentration of humic acid increasing. The adsorption efficiency of MIPs in surface water was only 12.6% lower than that of ultrapure water, which indicated that molecular imprinting process improved the anti-interference property. The photodegradation rate was 0.114 min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.