Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29260389›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Potential curability and perception of received information in esophageal cancer patients.

Eleonora Pinto, Francesco Cavallin, Luca Maria Saadeh, Maria Cristina Bellissimo, Rita Alfieri, Silvia Mantoan, Matteo Cagol, Carlo Castoro, Marco Scarpa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychological support of esophageal cancer patient?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleonora PintoEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Francesco CavallinEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Luca Maria SaadehEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Maria Cristina BellissimoEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Rita AlfieriEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Silvia MantoanEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Matteo CagolEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Carlo CastoroEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Marco ScarpaEsophageal and D igestive Tract Surgical Unit, Regional Centre for Esophageal Disease, Veneto Oncological Institute (IOV-IRCCS), via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy. marcoscarpa73@yahoo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate patients' perceived receipt of information according to the possibility of cure in esophageal cancer.

methodsOne hundred and twelve consecutive patients presenting at the multidisciplinary visit at the Veneto Institute of Oncology for esophageal cancer between 2014 and 2016 were included in the study. The Italian version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires C30 (core questionnaire), OG25 (esophago-gastric cancer module), and INFO25 (information module) were used.

resultsCandidates for palliative treatment were less informed about the disease (adjusted mean difference - 11.5, 95% CI - 23.0 to - 0.02) and less satisfied with information provided (adjusted mean difference - 18.3, 95% CI - 31.9 to - 4.7) than candidates for curative treatment. In addition, candidates for palliative treatment wanted to receive more information than candidates for curative treatment (adjusted mean difference 26.1, 95% CI 0.5 to 51.6). Better quality of life was associated with satisfaction of received information (β = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and of receiving information about things that the patient can do to help himself (β = 0.26, p = 0.04). More anxiety was associated to receiving more information about disease (β = 0.46, p = 0.02) but less information about things that the patient can do to help himself (β = - 0.38, p = 0.02).

conclusionsCandidates for palliative treatment were less satisfied with information about the disease and wanted to receive more information. Additionally, some aspects of quality of life were found to be associated with perceived receipt of information. Appropriate training in communication of prognostic information may improve clinical management of incurable cancer patients.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer managementCommunicationEsophageal cancerInformationQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.