ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2018
Integrative network-based approach identifies central genetic and transcriptomic elements in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic innovations in triple negative breast cancer: integrating molecular targeting and monoclonal antibody strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNA's prevalence as biomarkers for prognostic, diagnostic, and clinical utility in breast cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches to Map Potential Novel Genes and Pathways Involved in Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Comparison of gene co-networks reveals the molecular mechanisms of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to Rhizoctonia solani AG1 IA infection.Functional & integrative genomics · 2018Article
- Integrating CNVs into meta-QTL identified GBP4 as positional candidate for adult cattle stature.Functional & integrative genomics · 2018Article
- Comparison of gene co-networks analysis provide a systems view of rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to Tilletia horrida infection.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has gained considerable attention as it oversteps about 15% of the deaths caused by breast cancer in women and is well known for its aggressive impact, high proliferation rate, intensity of tumor, and metastasis. In this study, we have given a new insight into TNBC, by introducing an integrative network methodology to understand the complexity of the candidate genes in TNBC. In the course of this analysis, the central network was constructed by refining the candidate genes present in the various databases. Eventually, the hub genes SRC, EGFR, JUN, CTNNB1, and MYC were derived using distinct topological parameters such as degree, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and clustering coefficient, which implicated a central role in TNBC. Furthermore, the identified hub genes were validated by utilizing molecular complex detection cluster analysis. A regulatory network was constructed to locate the transcriptional factors regulating these hub genes via MatInspector. Interestingly, we characterized that ZF02, MZF1, and PLAG are the common transcription factors which activate the hub genes. Moreover, a functional enrichment pathway was obtained from ClueGo, which depicted that all the hub genes have a significant role in toxicity-associated pathways as well as physiochemical featured pathways. In a nutshell, these prioritized genes could be the way out to uncover the molecular and therapeutic targets, leading to the development of personalized medicine for TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.