Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29260299›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2018

[Updates to the WHO classification of bone tumours].

G Jundt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An adolescent case of sellar osteochondromyxoma in the setting of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Radiomics models based on non-enhanced MRI can differentiate chondrosarcoma from enchondroma].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G JundtKnochentumor-Referenzzentrum und DÖSAK-Referenzregister am Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Schönbeinstraße 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz. gernot.jundt@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fourth edition of the WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours, published in 2013, extends the approach to describe genetics and pathology of these tumours in the context of epidemiological, clinical and imaging data, which was adopted in the third edition. Added are a few new entities, reclassifications and renamings. The most important point, also of clinical relevance and with consequences for treatment, is the introduction of a stratification of bone tumours based on their biological behaviour into three groups (benign, intermediate, malignant) in analogy to soft tissue tumours.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsParagangliomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsHumansWorld Health OrganizationAtypical cartilaginous tumourBenign notochordal cell tumorBone TumorsChondromesenchymal hamartomaISSVA-classificationOsteochondromyxoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.