Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29260290›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Appropriateness criteria for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

S Luthman, J Widén, F Borgström

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Kyphoplasty is associated with reduced mortality risk for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Development and validation of a prediction model for vertebral recompression and adjacent vertebral fracture after kyphoplasty in geriatric patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. OF-score for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures- which parameter is decisive for the therapy decision? - a prospective multicentric cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic nutritional index and modified frailty index, independent risk factors for recompression in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S LuthmanQuantify Research, Hantverkargatan 8, SE-112 21, Stockholm, Sweden.
J WidénQuantify Research, Hantverkargatan 8, SE-112 21, Stockholm, Sweden. julia.widen@quantifyresearch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-1336
F BorgströmQuantify Research, Hantverkargatan 8, SE-112 21, Stockholm, Sweden.
Quantify Research (Sweden) · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review and summarise the literature on appropriateness criteria for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), with appropriateness defined as a treatment where the expected benefits outweigh the expected harms, confirmed by available evidence and expert opinion. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed publications (PubMed, EMBASE) and grey literature was performed. To be included for analysis, documents had to be a review article (e.g. clinical guideline or meta-analysis), focus on OVCF and make a statement on treatment appropriateness. Eleven publications fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Among the five publications that made recommendations about non-surgical management (NSM), there is agreement that conservative methods are appropriate in OVCF patients who have low level of pain, and that the majority of patients should be treated with conservative methods before other treatments are initiated. All publications made recommendations about vertebral augmentation procedures (VAP), i.e. vertebroplasty (VP) and/or balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). VAP are mostly considered appropriate in patients with high level of pain who do not respond to NSM. However, results cannot be generalised due to heterogeneity of treatment recommendations and patient selection. Although there is a consensus that NSM should be considered as the first-line treatment, there is more heterogeneity in treatment recommendations for VAP. This could most likely be explained by an insufficient clinical evidence base for VAP and heterogeneity of OVCF patients, leading to greater reliance on expert opinion affecting the quality of evidence in the primary sources.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionHumansKyphoplastyOsteoporotic FracturesPatient SelectionRisk AssessmentSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyAppropriatenessBalloon kyphoplastyOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesVertebral augmentationVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID29260290
OpenAlexW2776705331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.