Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29260246›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2018

[Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

G A Ahmed, B Ishaque, M Rickert, C Fölsch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hydroxyapatite From the Skull of Tuna (Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G A AhmedKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. Gafar.a.ahmed@ortho.med.uni-giessen.de.
B IshaqueKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
M RickertKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
C FölschKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
University of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of people having joint replacements will lead to increasing numbers of revision operations. The transplantation of allogeneic bones might reconstruct bone defects and improve long-term anchorage of the implant. A sufficient primary stability of the implanted construct is necessary to achieve osseous incorporation as well as tight contact between the implanted allogeneic and host bones. Transplantation of bone can contribute to downgrading acetabular defects and so avoid bigger reinforcement implants. An improvement of bone stock due to reconstruction of femoral bony defects might also reduce the size of the stem necessary since the indication might be limited in case of extensive bone defects. According to good longterm results of modular revision stems the Impaction-Bone-Grafting has not yet generally been established.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureAcetabulumAllograftsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone BanksBone TransplantationFemur HeadHumansOsseointegrationProsthesis DesignReoperationAcetabular defectBone bankBone-GraftingFemoral defectTotal hip replacement loosening

Identifiers

PMID29260246
OpenAlexW2776550558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.