ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017
A new strategy to interpret OCT posterior pole asymmetry analysis for glaucoma diagnosis.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posterior Pole Asymmetry Analysis as a Diagnostic Tool in Glaucoma Suspects: An Electrophysiological Approach.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Posterior Pole Asymmetry Analysis in the Children with Anisometropia.Beyoglu eye journal · 2022Article
- Posterior pole retinal thickness distribution pattern in keratoconus.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Outer Nuclear Layer Damage for Detection of Early Retinal Toxicity of Hydroxychloroquine.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo detect early glaucoma by optical coherence tomography (OCT) posterior pole asymmetry analysis.
methodsTotally 39 eyes from 39 healthy subjects, 40 eyes from 40 mild glaucoma patients, 33 eyes from 33 moderate glaucoma patients and 41 eyes from severe glaucoma patients were included in this study. All subjects underwent posterior pole asymmetry analysis (PPAA) of OCT and the posterior pole area was divided into three zones. Means, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals of each zone asymmetry in control group were assessed. Retina thickness asymmetry (RTA) of different stage of glaucoma were compared for each zone, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were made to test the efficacy of strategies using different zones to discriminate glaucomatous eyes from the healthy ones.
resultsIn a healthy population, RTA of the centre zone showed the minimal mean value (3.085 µm), standard deviation (1.756), and the narrowest 95% confidence interval (from 2.360 to 3.810 µm). It was only in the center zone that RTA exhibited significant difference between control and moderate glaucoma group (
conclusionUtilizing the posterior pole centre zone to interpret OCT PPAA results are more effective than making use of the whole posterior pole map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.