ReviewF1000Research2017
Premature ejaculation: challenging new and the old concepts.
Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Levosulpiride for Premature Ejaculation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of men's healthPooled it
- Hyaluronic acid injection in glans penis for treatment of premature ejaculation: a randomized controlled cross-over study.International journal of impotence research · 2019Trial
- Global Andrology Forum Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Premature Ejaculation.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Off-label Uses of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs).Current neuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Markers of Prenatal Androgen Exposure Correlate With Online Sexual Compulsivity and Erectile Function in Young Men.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Tramadol and Paroxetine in the Management of Premature Ejaculation.Cureus · 2020Article
- Advantages and limitations of current premature ejaculation assessment and diagnostic methods: a review.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Editorial to the paper entitled "pharmacotherapy of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis".International urology and nephrology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premature ejaculation remains a difficult condition to manage for patients, their partners, and the clinician. Whilst prevalence rates are estimated to be 20-40%, determining a diagnosis of premature ejaculation is difficult, as the definition remains both subjective and ill-defined in the clinical context. As our understanding of the ejaculatory pathway has improved, new opportunities to treat the condition have evolved with mixed results. In this review, we explore some of these controversies surrounding the aetiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition and discuss potential novel therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.