Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259522›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2017

Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in the Mammalian Central Nervous System.

Katherine E Savell, Jeremy J Day

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Status and Future Strategies for Advancing Functional Circuit MappingThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Cross-Platform Synaptic Network Analysis of Human Entorhinal Cortex Identifies TWF2 as a Modulator of Dendritic Spine Length.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Regulation and Role of Neuron-Derived Hemoglobin in the Mouse Hippocampus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic and epigenetic editing in
nervous system
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  14. Epigenetics and addiction.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Broad-spectrum enzymatic inhibition of CRISPR-Cas12a.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Editing the Central Nervous System Through CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine E SavellDepartment of Neurobiology and Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Jeremy J DayDepartment of Neurobiology and Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Funding

Epigenetic Control of Brain Reward SystemsDP1DA039650 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAY, JEREMY J · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Epigenetic Regulation of Cocaine-Induced NeuroadaptationsR00DA034681 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAY, JEREMY J · 2014 to 2016
$741k
Gene-Specific Epigenetic Modifications in Cocaine-Induced PlasticityF31DA042514 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAVELL, KATHERINE ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2019
$94k
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA039650NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA042514NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA034681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the central nervous system, gene regulatory mechanisms are crucial regulators of cellular development and function, and dysregulation of these systems is commonly observed in major neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. However, due to a lack of tools to specifically modulate the genome and epigenome in the central nervous system, many molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying cognitive function and behavior are still unknown. Although genome editing tools have been around for decades, the recent emergence of inexpensive, straightforward, and widely accessible CRISPR/Cas9 systems has led to a revolution in gene editing. The development of the catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9) expanded this flexibility even further by acting as an anchoring system for fused effector proteins, structural scaffolds, and RNAs. Together, these advances have enabled robust, modular approaches for specific targeting and modification of the local chromatin environment at a single gene. This review highlights these advancements and how the combination of powerful modulatory tools paired with the versatility of CRISPR-Cas9-based systems offer great potential for understanding the underlying genetic and epigenetic contributions of neuronal function, behavior, and neurobiological diseases.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCellular Reprogramming TechniquesCentral Nervous SystemEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMammalsProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR/Cas9epigenetic editingepigeneticsgenome editingneuroepigeneticsneuron

Identifiers

PMID29259522
PMCPMC5733858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.