Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259450›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2017

Phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of recombinant- or urine-derived human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering in Japanese women diagnosed with anovulation or oligo-ovulation and undergoing ovulation induction with follitropin-alfa.

Hideyuki Ikenaga, Yudai Tanaka, Masahide Shiotani, Daniela Rogoff, Shin Shimizu, Osamu Ishihara, Yoshiaki Sato, Yoshiharu Morimoto, Aisaku Fukuda, Kohzo Aisaka and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hideyuki IkenagaBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Yudai TanakaMedical Park Shonan Fujisawa Japan.
Masahide ShiotaniHanabusa Women's Central Fertility Clinic Kobe Japan.
Daniela RogoffEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. Billerica Massachusetts USA.
Shin ShimizuMerck Serono Company, Ltd Tokyo Japan.
Osamu IshiharaSaitama Medical University Hospital Saitama Japan.
Yoshiaki SatoBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Yoshiharu MorimotoBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Aisaku FukudaBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Kohzo AisakaBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Koji YoshidaBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Naoki HayashiBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Hirotsugu OkuBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Yuji AbeBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Atsushi HarukiBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Motoharu IshikawaBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Takeshi KuramotoBashamichi Ladies Clinic Yokohama Japan.
Kobe Women's University · JPLadies College · LKMerck Serono (Italy) · ITOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USSaitama Medical University Hospital · JPShonan Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Outside of Japan, recombinant-human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) is widely used for the induction of final follicular maturation and early luteinization in women undergoing ovulation induction; whereas in Japan, urine-derived hCG (u-hCG) is predominantly used. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of r-hCG to u-hCG for ovulation induction, as assessed by the ovulation rate. Methods: This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial in Japanese women with anovulation or oligo-ovulation secondary to hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction or polycystic ovary syndrome, undergoing ovulation induction with recombinant-human follicle-stimulating hormone. The women were randomized (2:1) to receive either a single 250 μg s.c. dose of r-hCG or a single 5000 IU i.m. dose of u-hCG for ovulation triggering. Results: Eighty-one women were randomized to either r-hCG (n=54) or u-hCG (n=27). Ovulation occurred in 100% of the participants and treatment with r-hCG was observed to be non-inferior to u-hCG for ovulation induction. Overall, the type and severity of adverse events were as expected for women receiving fertility treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that r-hCG was non-inferior to u-hCG for inducing ovulation. Furthermore, r-hCG demonstrated an expected safety profile, with no new safety concerns identified.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive techniqueshuman chorionic gonadotropinoocyte retrievalovulationovulation induction

Identifiers

PMID29259450
PMCPMC5715878
OpenAlexW2574291741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.