Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259442›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2016

Predicting suitable timing for artificial reproductive technology treatment in aged infertile women.

Nana Akino, Wataru Isono, Osamu Wada-Hiraike

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation analysis between C natriuretic peptide and pregnancy outcome.American journal of translational research · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nana AkinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 1113-8655 Tokyo Japan.
Wataru IsonoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 1113-8655 Tokyo Japan.
Osamu Wada-HiraikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 1113-8655 Tokyo Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPWeatherford College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been widely accepted that the age of women plays a fundamental role in fecundity, and age-related fertility decline has one of the most significant and detrimental effects on the success rate of infertility treatment. Therefore, treatment cycles of non-in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment for infertile women of advanced aged have been limited due to their lack of efficacy, and they are often optimized, compared to IVF/ICSI treatment. Recent trends in infertility treatment apparently indicate that IVF/ICSI treatment, including egg donation, is frequently offered to aged women for first-line management, despite its heavy burden, but hasty IVF/ICSI treatment should be avoided, considering its socioeconomic problems. It is important to distinguish women who could conceive by non-IVF/ICSI treatment, although the optimization of non-IVF/ICSI treatment protocols remains poorly understood. This review focuses on extracting aged patients who have higher chance of conceiving with non-IVF/ICSI treatment and providing necessary and sufficient infertility treatment. After initial evaluation for fertility, including tubal factor, male factor, the presence of endometriosis and/or adenomyosis, and ovarian reserve, the outcomes of fertility treatment can be predicted to some extent in aged infertile women.

Indexed as

Advanced reproductive ageAnti‐Müllerian hormoneInfertilityIntrauterine inseminationTreatment protocol

Identifiers

PMID29259442
PMCPMC5715864
OpenAlexW2327138858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.