Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259338›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2018

The validity of dietary assessment methods to accurately measure energy intake in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese: a systematic review.

Jacqueline L Walker, Stephen Ardouin, Tracy Burrows

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Comparison of different cariogenic dietary assessment methods in children.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Food intake and eating behaviour during a real-life Snack Scenario in childhood obesity-An experiment using a hidden camera.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline L WalkerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. j.walker3@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-453X
Stephen ArdouinSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Tracy BurrowsPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition and the School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-7864
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate assessment of energy intake in children and adolescents is an important outcome measure for clinical and population-based research. This systematic review aimed to determine the validity of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in children and adolescents who are classified as overweight or obese by comparison with doubly labelled water. Five electronic databases were searched using keywords. Of the 5263 papers identified, seven papers describing six studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were included in the review if participants were classified as overweight or obese, aged 0-18 years old, if they estimated energy intake via a dietary assessment method and if they compared this to total energy expenditure measured via the doubly labelled water method. All studies were cross-sectional in nature, and each used one dietary assessment method, including 14-day-food record (FR; n = 1), 24 h dietary recall (n = 1), 8-day FR (n = 1), 9-day FR (n = 1), 3-day FR (n = 1) and diet history interview (n = 1). Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 59 participants, with the majority of studies including less than 30 participants (n = 4). Mis-reporting was evident in all of the studies, with under-reporting (n = 5) more frequent than over-reporting (n = 1). Findings from this review suggest that a 24-h dietary recall and diet history interview were the most accurate methods at the group level for children aged 4-14 years, where the parent or combined child and parent were the reporters.

Indexed as

DietDiet RecordsEnergy IntakeNutrition AssessmentOverweightPediatric ObesityAdolescentBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID29259338
PMCPMC5842879
OpenAlexW2772826198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.