Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Higher plasticity in feeding preference of a generalist than a specialist: experiments with two closely related Helicoverpa species.

Yan Wang, Ying Ma, Dong-Sheng Zhou, Su-Xia Gao, Xin-Cheng Zhao, Qing-Bo Tang, Chen-Zhu Wang, Joop J A van Loon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan WangThe Institute of Chemical Ecology & College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Ying MaThe Institute of Chemical Ecology & College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Dong-Sheng ZhouHengyang Normal University, Hengyang, 421008, China.
Su-Xia GaoInstitute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Xin-Cheng ZhaoThe Institute of Chemical Ecology & College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9471-2222
Qing-Bo TangThe Institute of Chemical Ecology & College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. qingbotang@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7995-504X
Chen-Zhu WangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. joop.vanloon@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4260-0501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbivorous insects have been categorized as generalists or specialists depending on the taxonomic relatedness of the plants they use as food or oviposition substrates. The plasticity in host plant selection behavior of species belonging to the two categories received little attention. In the present work, fifth instar caterpillars of the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera and its closely related species, the specialist Helicoverpa assulta, were fed on common host plants or artificial diet, after which their feeding preference was assessed individually by using dual - and triple- plant choice assays. Results show both the two Helicoverpa species have a preference hierarchy for host plants. Compared to the fixed preference hierarchy of the specialist H. assulta, the generalist H. armigera exhibited extensive plasticity in feeding preference depending on the host plant experienced during larval development. Whereas the specialist H. assulta exhibited a rigid preference in both dual and triple-plant choice assays, our findings demonstrate that the generalist H. armigera expressed stronger preferences in the dual-plant choice assay than in the triple-plant choice assay. Our results provide additional evidence supporting the neural constraints hypothesis which predicts that generalist herbivores make less accurate decisions than specialists when selecting plants.

Indexed as

AnimalsDietFeeding BehaviorHerbivoryLarvaLepidopteraOvipositionPlantsSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID29259307
PMCPMC5736596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.