Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259073›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2018

Phase II Study of Panitumumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Small Bowel or Ampulla of Vater.

Pat Gulhati, Kanwal Raghav, Rachna Shroff, Gauri Varadhachary, Milind Javle, Wei Qiao, Huamin Wang, Jeffrey Morris, Robert Wolff, Michael J Overman

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Progress in the Treatment of Small Intestine Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pat GulhatiHematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kanwal RaghavDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rachna ShroffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gauri VaradhacharyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Wei QiaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, Houston, Texas, USA.
Huamin WangDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey MorrisDepartment of Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, Houston, Texas, USA.
Robert WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA moverman@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedPanitumumab has no clinical activity in metastatic RAS wild-type small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC), possibly due to the foregut and midgut derivation of small bowel and ampulla.These results, along with findings from genomic characterization of SBA, suggest that SBA represents a unique intestinal malignancy and treatments should not be habitually extrapolated from colorectal cancer.Further studies evaluating the benefit of targeted therapies exclusively in SBA and AAC are warranted.

backgroundGiven the benefit of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer (CRC), we sought to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab in metastatic RAS wild-type small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC).

methodsWe conducted a single-center, open-label, single-arm, Bayesian phase II trial. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Panitumumab was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 14 days.

resultsNine patients (male/female 7:2, median age: 61 years [range: 40-74], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 0/1: 2/7) were enrolled from September 2013 to October 2015. One patient had AAC (pancreaticobiliary subtype) and eight patients had SBA (three duodenal, five jejunal/ileal). Acneiform rash was the most common toxicity. The study was stopped early due to futility with no responses, stable disease (SD) in two patients, and progression of disease (PD) in seven patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 5.7 months, respectively. No patients had extended RAS mutations (exons 2/3/4), but two patients had BRAF G469A and one patient had PIK3CA H1074R mutations.

conclusionPanitumumab had no clinically meaningful activity in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type SBA and AAC. Our findings may relate to the primarily midgut and foregut derivation of the small bowel and ampulla.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAmpulla of VaterAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Treatment FailureAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID29259073
PMCPMC5905687
OpenAlexW2777773993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.