Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29259023›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2017

Sophisticated lessons from simple organisms: appreciating the value of curiosity-driven research.

Robert J Duronio, Patrick H O'Farrell, Greenfield Sluder, Tin Tin Su

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Therapeutic Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Exploring the Impact ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  5. Yeast as a Model to Find New Drugs and Drug Targets forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. One hundred years ofDisease models & mechanisms · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent Developments in UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J DuronioDepartments of Biology and Genetics, Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Patrick H O'FarrellDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158-2517, USA.
Greenfield SluderDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Tin Tin SuDepartment of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA tin.su@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-4390
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

HISTONE MRNA REGULATION IN DEVELOPMENTR01GM058921 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DURONIO, ROBERT J, MARZLUFF, WILLIAM F. · 1999 to 2025
$11.6M
RNA IN FORMATION, FUNCTION, AND REPRODUCTION OF CENTROSOR01GM030758 · NIGMS · WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI SLUDER, GREENFIELD · 1985 to 2014
$6.4M
Developmental Programs of Cell Cycle ControlR37GM037193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2010 to 2019
$4.8M
Engineering histone genes to interrogate the epigenetic code in space and timeR01DA036897 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DURONIO, ROBERT J, MATERA, A. GREGORY · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
Host management of the mitochondrial genomeR01GM120005 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
Consequences of Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM106317 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036897NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030758NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058921NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106317NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120005NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM037193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For hundreds of years, biologists have studied accessible organisms such as garden peas, sea urchins collected at low tide, newt eggs, and flies circling rotten fruit. These organisms help us to understand the world around us, attracting and inspiring each new generation of biologists with the promise of mystery and discovery. Time and time again, what we learn from such simple organisms has emphasized our common biological origins by proving to be applicable to more complex organisms, including humans. Yet, biologists are increasingly being tasked with developing applications from the known, rather than being allowed to follow a path to discovery of the as yet unknown. Here, we provide examples of important lessons learned from research using selected non-vertebrate organisms. We argue that, for the purpose of understanding human disease, simple organisms cannot and should not be replaced solely by human cell-based culture systems. Rather, these organisms serve as powerful discovery tools for new knowledge that could subsequently be tested for conservation in human cell-based culture systems. In this way, curiosity-driven biological research in simple organisms has and will continue to pay huge dividends in both the short and long run for improving the human condition.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalResearchAnimalsGenetic TestingModels, BiologicalC. elegansDrosophilaInvertebratesSea urchinYeast

Identifiers

PMID29259023
PMCPMC5769611
OpenAlexW2777423703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.