Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258599›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

Transition in care from paramedics to emergency department nurses: a systematic review protocol.

Gudrun Reay, Jill M Norris, K Alix Hayden, Joanna Abraham, Katherine Yokom, Lorelli Nowell, Gerald C Lazarenko, Eddy S Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gudrun ReayFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. gudrun.reay2@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-4132
Jill M NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
K Alix HaydenLibraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Joanna AbrahamDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences,, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA.
Katherine YokomEmergency Medical Services, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Lorelli NowellFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Gerald C LazarenkoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Eddy S LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective and efficient transitions in care between emergency medical services (EMS) practitioners and emergency department (ED) nurses is vital as poor clinical transitions in care may place patients at increased risk for adverse events such as delay in treatment for time sensitive conditions (e.g., myocardial infarction) or worsening of status (e.g., sepsis). Such transitions in care are complex and prone to communication errors primarily caused by misunderstanding related to divergent professional perspectives leading to misunderstandings that are further susceptible to contextual factors and divergent professional lenses. In this systematic review, we aim to examine (1) factors that mitigate or improve transitions in care specifically from EMS practitioners to ED nurses, and (2) effectiveness of interventional strategies that lead to improvements in communication and fewer adverse events.

methodsWe will search electronic databases (DARE, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP; Communication Abstracts); gray literature (gray literature databases, organization websites, querying experts in emergency medicine); and reference lists and conduct forward citation searches of included studies. All English-language primary studies will be eligible for inclusion if the study includes (1) EMS practitioners or ED nurses involved in transitions for arriving EMS patients; and (2) an intervention to improve transitions in care or description of factors that influence transitions in care (barriers/facilitators, perceptions, experiences, quality of information exchange). Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts for inclusion and methodological quality. We will use narrative and thematic synthesis to integrate and explore relationships within the data. Should the data permit, a meta-analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will help identify factors that influence communication between EMS and ED nurses during transitions in care, and identify interventional strategies that lead to improved communication and decrease in adverse events. The findings can be used to develop an evidence-informed transitions in care tool that ensures efficient transfer of accurate patient information, continuity of care, enhances patient safety, and avoids duplication of services. This review will also identify gaps in the existing literature to inform future research efforts.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42017068844.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffAllied Health PersonnelCommunicationEmergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient SafetyPatient TransferSystematic Reviews as TopicEmergency department triageEmergency medical servicesHandoverParamedicsSystematic reviewTransfer of careTransition in care

Identifiers

PMID29258599
PMCPMC5738052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.