Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258549›Full record

Trial reportGlobalization and health2017

Effectiveness of home-based nutritional counselling and support on exclusive breastfeeding in urban poor settings in Nairobi: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Elizabeth W Kimani-Murage, Paula L Griffiths, Frederick Murunga Wekesah, Milka Wanjohi, Nelson Muhia, Peter Muriuki, Thaddaeus Egondi, Catherine Kyobutungi, Alex C Ezeh, Stephen T McGarvey and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Globalization and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Elizabeth W Kimani-MurageAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya. ekimani@aphrc.org.
Paula L GriffithsCentre for Global Health and Human Development, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Frederick Murunga WekesahAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Milka WanjohiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Nelson MuhiaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Peter MuriukiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Thaddaeus EgondiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Catherine KyobutungiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Alex C EzehAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Stephen T McGarveyInternational Health Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Rachel N MusokeDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shane A NorrisMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nyovani J MadiseCentre for Global Health, Population, Poverty, and Policy University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
African Population and Health Research Center · KEBrown University · USLoughborough University · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Science/Technical CoreP2CHD041020 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENCHAO QIAN · 2016 to 2026
$7.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041020Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097146/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExclusive breastfeeding (EBF) improves infant health and survival. We tested the effectiveness of a home-based intervention using Community Health Workers (CHWs) on EBF for six months in urban poor settings in Kenya.

methodsWe conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Korogocho and Viwandani slums in Nairobi. We recruited pregnant women and followed them until the infant's first birthday. Fourteen community clusters were randomized to intervention or control arm. The intervention arm received home-based nutritional counselling during scheduled visits by CHWs trained to provide specific maternal infant and young child nutrition (MIYCN) messages and standard care. The control arm was visited by CHWs who were not trained in MIYCN and they provided standard care (which included aspects of ante-natal and post-natal care, family planning, water, sanitation and hygiene, delivery with skilled attendance, immunization and community nutrition). CHWs in both groups distributed similar information materials on MIYCN. Differences in EBF by intervention status were tested using chi square and logistic regression, employing intention-to-treat analysis.

resultsA total of 1110 mother-child pairs were involved, about half in each arm. At baseline, demographic and socioeconomic factors were similar between the two arms. The rates of EBF for 6 months increased from 2% pre-intervention to 55.2% (95% CI 50.4-59.9) in the intervention group and 54.6% (95% CI 50.0-59.1) in the control group. The adjusted odds of EBF (after adjusting for baseline characteristics) were slightly higher in the intervention arm compared to the control arm but not significantly different: for 0-2 months (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.96; p = 0.550); 0-4 months (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.54 to 2.42; p = 0.696), and 0-6 months (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.02; p = 0.718).

conclusionsEBF for six months significantly increased in both arms indicating potential effectiveness of using CHWs to provide home-based counselling to mothers. The lack of any difference in EBF rates in the two groups suggests potential contamination of the control arm by information reserved for the intervention arm. Nevertheless, this study indicates a great potential for use of CHWs when they are incentivized and monitored as an effective model of promotion of EBF, particularly in urban poor settings. Given the equivalence of the results in both arms, the study suggests that the basic nutritional training given to CHWs in the basic primary health care training, and/or provision of information materials may be adequate in improving EBF rates in communities. However, further investigations on this may be needed. One contribution of these findings to implementation science is the difficulty in finding an appropriate counterfactual for community-based educational interventions.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN83692672 . Registered 11 November 2012. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

CounselingHome Care ServicesNutritional SciencesPoverty AreasSocial SupportUrban PopulationBreast FeedingCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyChild nutritionCluster randomized controlled trialsExclusive breastfeedingInfant feeding practicesKenyaSub-Saharan AfricaUrban slums

Identifiers

PMID29258549
PMCPMC5735795
OpenAlexW2773521601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.