Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258524›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Using an intervention mapping approach to develop a discharge protocol for intensive care patients.

Margo van Mol, Marjan Nijkamp, Christine Markham, Erwin Ista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margo van MolDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Room 1005, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vanmol@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-6054
Marjan NijkampFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Christine MarkhamCenter for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, USA.
Erwin IstaDepartment of Intensive Care Children, Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Erasmus MC, "Evidence Based Care by Nurses", 2015-15404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmission into an intensive care unit (ICU) may result in long-term physical, cognitive, and emotional consequences for patients and their relatives. The care of the critically ill patient does not end upon ICU discharge; therefore, integrated and ongoing care during and after transition to the follow-up ward is pivotal. This study described the development of an intervention that responds to this need.

methodsIntervention Mapping (IM), a six-step theory- and evidence-based approach, was used to guide intervention development. The first step, a problem analysis, comprised a literature review, six semi-structured telephone interviews with former ICU-patients and their relatives, and seven qualitative roundtable meetings for all eligible nurses (i.e., 135 specialized and 105 general ward nurses). Performance and change objectives were formulated in step two. In step three, theory-based methods and practical applications were selected and directed at the desired behaviors and the identified barriers. Step four designed a revised discharge protocol taking into account existing interventions. Adoption, implementation and evaluation of the new discharge protocol (IM steps five and six) are in progress and were not included in this study.

resultsFour former ICU patients and two relatives underlined the importance of the need for effective discharge information and supportive written material. They also reported a lack of knowledge regarding the consequences of ICU admission. 42 ICU and 19 general ward nurses identified benefits and barriers regarding discharge procedures using three vignettes framed by literature. Some discrepancies were found. For example, ICU nurses were skeptical about the impact of writing a lay summary despite extensive evidence of the known benefits for the patients. ICU nurses anticipated having insufficient skills, not knowing the patient well enough, and fearing legal consequences of their writings. The intervention was designed to target the knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and perceived social influence. Building upon IM steps one to three, a concept discharge protocol was developed that is relevant and feasible within current daily practice.

conclusionIntervention mapping provided a comprehensive framework to improve ICU discharge by guiding the development process of a theory- and empirically-based discharge protocol that is robust and useful in practice.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCritical CarePatient DischargeCritical IllnessEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterviews as TopicMalePatients' RoomsProgram DevelopmentDischarge protocolEmotional distressHealth service researchIntensive care unitIntervention mappingTransition procedure

Identifiers

PMID29258524
PMCPMC5737483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.