ArticleBMC ecology2017
Non-invasive genetic monitoring involving citizen science enables reconstruction of current pack dynamics in a re-establishing wolf population.
Article in BMC ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- MixedUpParents: A New and Improved Method for Genetic Parentage Assignment in Admixed Populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Wild Pedigree exploreR (wpeR): Streamlined Analysis and Visualization of Wild Pedigrees in Time and Space.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Development of a cost-effective, multifunctional SNP panel and analysis workflow for Wolf monitoring in Finland.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Relatedness-based mate choice and female philopatry: inbreeding trends of wolf packs in a human-dominated landscape.Heredity · 2024Article
- The contribution ofParasitology · 2023Review
- Citizen science facilitates first ever genetic detection of wolf-dog hybridization in Indian savannahs.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Density-habitat relationships of white-tailed deer (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Whole-genome resequencing of temporally stratified samples reveals substantial loss of haplotype diversity in the highly inbred Scandinavian wolf population.Genome research · 2022Article
- Zoonotic Blood-Borne Pathogens in Non-Human Primates in the Neotropical Region: A Systematic Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- How the west was won: genetic reconstruction of rapid wolf recolonization into Germany's anthropogenic landscapes.Heredity · 2021Article
- Reliable wolf-dog hybrid detection in Europe using a reduced SNP panel developed for non-invasively collected samples.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Responses of sympatric canids to human development revealed through citizen science.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Environmental observation, social media, and One Health action: A description of the Local Environmental Observer (LEO) Network.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarnivores are re-establishing in many human-populated areas, where their presence is often contentious. Reaching consensus on management decisions is often hampered by a dispute over the size of the local carnivore population. Understanding the reproductive dynamics and individual movements of the carnivores can provide support for management decisions, but individual-level information can be difficult to obtain from elusive, wide-ranging species. Non-invasive genetic sampling can yield such information, but makes subsequent reconstruction of population history challenging due to incomplete population coverage and error-prone data. Here, we combine a collaborative, volunteer-based sampling scheme with Bayesian pedigree reconstruction to describe the pack dynamics of an establishing grey wolf (Canis lupus) population in south-west Finland, where wolf breeding was recorded in 2006 for the first time in over a century.
resultsUsing DNA extracted mainly from faeces collected since 2008, we identified 81 individual wolves and assigned credible full parentages to 70 of these and partial parentages to a further 9, revealing 7 breeding pairs. Individuals used a range of strategies to obtain breeding opportunities, including dispersal to established or new packs, long-distance migration and inheriting breeding roles. Gene flow occurred between all packs but inbreeding events were rare.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that characterizing ongoing pack dynamics can provide detailed, locally-relevant insight into the ecology of contentious species such as the wolf. Involving various stakeholders in data collection makes these results more likely to be accepted as unbiased and hence reliable grounds for management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.