Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258497›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2017

Non-invasive genetic monitoring involving citizen science enables reconstruction of current pack dynamics in a re-establishing wolf population.

Hanna Granroth-Wilding, Craig Primmer, Meri Lindqvist, Jenni Poutanen, Olaf Thalmann, Jouni Aspi, Jenni Harmoinen, Ilpo Kojola, Toni Laaksonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The contribution ofParasitology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hanna Granroth-WildingDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. hanna@granroth-wilding.co.uk.
Craig PrimmerDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Meri LindqvistDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jenni PoutanenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Olaf ThalmannDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jouni AspiEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jenni HarmoinenEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Ilpo KojolaNatural Resources Institute (Luke), Rovaniemi, Finland.
Toni LaaksonenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-7131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarnivores are re-establishing in many human-populated areas, where their presence is often contentious. Reaching consensus on management decisions is often hampered by a dispute over the size of the local carnivore population. Understanding the reproductive dynamics and individual movements of the carnivores can provide support for management decisions, but individual-level information can be difficult to obtain from elusive, wide-ranging species. Non-invasive genetic sampling can yield such information, but makes subsequent reconstruction of population history challenging due to incomplete population coverage and error-prone data. Here, we combine a collaborative, volunteer-based sampling scheme with Bayesian pedigree reconstruction to describe the pack dynamics of an establishing grey wolf (Canis lupus) population in south-west Finland, where wolf breeding was recorded in 2006 for the first time in over a century.

resultsUsing DNA extracted mainly from faeces collected since 2008, we identified 81 individual wolves and assigned credible full parentages to 70 of these and partial parentages to a further 9, revealing 7 breeding pairs. Individuals used a range of strategies to obtain breeding opportunities, including dispersal to established or new packs, long-distance migration and inheriting breeding roles. Gene flow occurred between all packs but inbreeding events were rare.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that characterizing ongoing pack dynamics can provide detailed, locally-relevant insight into the ecology of contentious species such as the wolf. Involving various stakeholders in data collection makes these results more likely to be accepted as unbiased and hence reliable grounds for management decisions.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGene FlowAnimalsBayes TheoremData CollectionFemaleFinlandMalePedigreePopulation DynamicsWolvesEvidence-based conservationHuman–wildlife conflictPredatorStakeholder involvementWildlife management

Identifiers

PMID29258497
PMCPMC5738207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.