Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258483›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Developing a policy game intervention to enhance collaboration in public health policymaking in three European countries.

H P E M Spitters, J A M van Oers, P Sandu, C J Lau, M Quanjel, D Dulf, R Chereches, L A M van de Goor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. 'Serious Games' for unboxing Global Digital Health policymaking.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

H P E M SpittersDepartment of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. h.p.e.m.spitters@tilburguniversity.edu.
J A M van OersDepartment of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
P SanduDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
C J LauResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Centre of Health, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, -2600, Glostrup, DK, Denmark.
M QuanjelEntrea, Youth Care, Special Needs Education and Research, P.O. Box 6546, 6503, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
D DulfDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
R CherechesDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
L A M van de GoorDepartment of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Babeș-Bolyai University · ROTilburg University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLNetherlands Youth Institute · NLRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) 281532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the key elements to enhance the uptake of evidence in public health policies is stimulating cross-sector collaboration. An intervention stimulating collaboration is a policy game. The aim of this study was to describe the design and methods of the development process of the policy game ‘In2Action’ within a real-life setting of public health policymaking networks in the Netherlands, Denmark and Romania.

methodsThe development of the policy game intervention consisted of three phases, pre intervention, designing the game intervention and tailoring the intervention.

resultsIn2Action was developed as a role-play game of one day, with main focus to develop in collaboration a cross-sector implementation plan based on the approved strategic local public health policy.

conclusionsThis study introduced an innovative intervention for public health policymaking. It described the design and development of the generic frame of the In2Action game focusing on enhancing collaboration in local public health policymaking networks. By keeping the game generic, it became suitable for each of the three country cases with only minor changes. The generic frame of the game is expected to be generalizable for other European countries to stimulate interaction and collaboration in the policy process.

Indexed as

Game TheoryHealth PolicyPolicy MakingPublic HealthCooperative BehaviorDenmarkHumansNetherlandsRomaniaCross-sector collaborationPolicy gamePublic health policymakingStakeholder network

Identifiers

PMID29258483
PMCPMC5735538
OpenAlexW2780007897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.