Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258433›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Similar genomic proportions of copy number variation within gray wolves and modern dog breeds inferred from whole genome sequencing.

Aitor Serres-Armero, Inna S Povolotskaya, Javier Quilez, Oscar Ramirez, Gabriel Santpere, Lukas F K Kuderna, Jessica Hernandez-Rodriguez, Marcos Fernandez-Callejo, Daniel Gomez-Sanchez, Adam H Freedman and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Aitor Serres-ArmeroIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-811X
Inna S PovolotskayaIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier QuilezIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Oscar RamirezIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriel SantpereIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Lukas F K KudernaIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Jessica Hernandez-RodriguezIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Marcos Fernandez-CallejoCNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel Gomez-SanchezIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Adam H FreedmanUCLA, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Zhenxin FanKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, People's Republic of China.
John NovembreUCLA, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Arcadi NavarroIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Adam BoykoCornell University, Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, New York, NY, 14853, USA.
Robert WayneUCLA, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Carles VilàEstación Biológica de Doñana EBD-CSIC, Department of Integrative Ecology, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Belen Lorente-GaldosIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. belen.lorente@gmail.com.
Tomas Marques-BonetIBE, Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Universitat Pompeu Fabra/CSIC), Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. tomas.marques@upf.edu.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESCornell University · USEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESSichuan University · CN

Funding

2/2 Somatic mosaicism and autism spectrum disorderU01MH106874 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SESTAN, NENAD · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Beatriu de Pinós BP-DGR 2014Juan de la Cierva FJCI-2015-24275MICINN BFU2014-55090-PNIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106874Spanish Ministry of Education BES-2013-064333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole genome re-sequencing data from dogs and wolves are now commonly used to study how natural and artificial selection have shaped the patterns of genetic diversity. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, microsatellites and variants in mitochondrial DNA have been interrogated for links to specific phenotypes or signals of domestication. However, copy number variation (CNV), despite its increasingly recognized importance as a contributor to phenotypic diversity, has not been extensively explored in canids.

resultsHere, we develop a new accurate probabilistic framework to create fine-scale genomic maps of segmental duplications (SDs), compare patterns of CNV across groups and investigate their role in the evolution of the domestic dog by using information from 34 canine genomes. Our analyses show that duplicated regions are enriched in genes and hence likely possess functional importance. We identify 86 loci with large CNV differences between dogs and wolves, enriched in genes responsible for sensory perception, immune response, metabolic processes, etc. In striking contrast to the observed loss of nucleotide diversity in domestic dogs following the population bottlenecks that occurred during domestication and breed creation, we find a similar proportion of CNV loci in dogs and wolves, suggesting that other dynamics are acting to particularly select for CNVs with potentially functional impacts.

conclusionsThis work is the first comparison of genome wide CNV patterns in domestic and wild canids using whole-genome sequencing data and our findings contribute to study the impact of novel kinds of genetic changes on the evolution of the domestic dog.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAnimalsBreedingDogsGenomicsSegmental Duplications, GenomicSequence Analysis, DNAWolvesCopy number variationDog genomicsDomesticationEvolution

Identifiers

PMID29258433
PMCPMC5735816
OpenAlexW2779519827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.